{"id":31546,"date":"2020-05-31T21:33:13","date_gmt":"2020-05-31T21:33:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/?post_type=litigiopt&#038;p=31546"},"modified":"2021-06-08T17:17:04","modified_gmt":"2021-06-08T17:17:04","slug":"border-decrees-violation-of-the-right-to-migrate","status":"publish","type":"litigiopt","link":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/litigiopt\/border-decrees-violation-of-the-right-to-migrate\/","title":{"rendered":"Border decrees: violation of the right to migrate"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"tts_content_wrapper_1\" ><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Over the course of the pandemic, a policy coordinated between the Chief of Staff and the Ministry of Justice and Public Security, the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Infrastructure led to the publication of several decrees with identical content violating the right to migrate and seek asylum, in what was a veritable assault on national laws, the Constitution and international treaties signed by Brazil.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>The decrees were also blatantly discriminatory against migrants from Venezuela<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0These migrants represent the largest inflow to Brazil, which recognizes them as victims of serious and widespread human rights violations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One of these decrees is no. 225\/2020. In a Public Civil Action submitted to the Federal Courts of Rio Grande do Sul, the Federal Public Defender\u2019s Office demanded the suspension of specific provisions of the text published by the federal government.\u00a0<\/span><b>The goal was to guarantee the rights of tens of millions of people who want to enter the country, whether as tourists, migrants or asylum seekers.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Conectas and Caritas Archdiocese of S\u00e3o Paulo filed a request for amicus curiae status in the case, but it was not granted. In their request, the organizations stated that Decree 225 violates several fundamental principles, both formally (by overstepping the bounds of the federal government) and materially (by restricting fundamental rights guaranteed in hierarchically superior statutes, including the Constitution and international treaties signed by Brazil).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The case was dismissed in the trial court ruling. The Federal Public Defender\u2019s Office appealed the decision and is awaiting the appeal to be judged by the Federal Appeals Court of the 4th Region (TRF-4).<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><b>Technical information<\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Case:\u00a0ACP 5031124-06.2020.4.04.7100<\/b><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Court:\u00a0<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">3rd Federal Court of Porto Alegre<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Status:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0The case was dismissed in the trial court ruling. The Public Defender\u2019s Office appealed the decision and is awaiting judgment by the TRF-4.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Procedure:<\/b>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5\/27\/20: Initial petition<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5\/31\/20: Request for admission of the organizations as amicus curiae<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><div class=\"tts__custom-position_bottom_fixed\" ><\/div>","protected":false},"featured_media":29621,"menu_order":0,"template":"","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"temaltigio":[12274],"categoria_litigio":[12976],"class_list":["post-31546","litigiopt","type-litigiopt","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","temaltigio-democracy-and-human-rights-movement","categoria_litigio-litigation"],"acf":{"subtitle-pt":"Conectas, Caritas and Public Defender\u2019s Office denounce discriminatory policy against Venezuelans to federal court","noticias":{"noticia1":{"ID":28075,"post_author":"2","post_date":"2021-02-26 20:46:07","post_date_gmt":"2021-02-26 20:46:07","post_content":"On Thursday, February 25, Conectas and Miss\u00e3o Paz filed a representation petition with the Federal Prosecutor\u2019s Office requesting an investigation into the discriminatory closure of land borders for refugees coming from Venezuela.\r\n\r\nDocuments produced by Anvisa (National Health Regulatory Agency) reveal that there was no guidance from the regulator to put segregated bans on the entry of people to Brazil from border countries during the restrictions imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic.\r\n\r\nThe documents were sent to Conectas in response to a<a href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/PARECER_JURI%CC%81DICO_SANITA%CC%81RIO_FRONTEIRAS_CEPEDISA_FSP_USP.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> <strong>technical opinion<\/strong><\/span><\/a> produced by Cepedisa\u00a0(Center for Research on Health Law of the University of S\u00e3o Paulo) and addressed to the agency in December last year. The study demonstrated that the restrictions imposed by the federal government through decrees published over the course of 2020 <a href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/noticias\/fechamento-de-fronteiras-para-refugiados-nao-possui-base-juridica-e-sanitaria-aponta-centro-de-pesquisa-da-usp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>are not based on legal or health grounds<\/strong>.<\/span><\/a>\r\n\r\nIn response to the technical opinion, the agency declared that \u201cthere are no recommendations to segregate any border country\u201d. However, the current<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.in.gov.br\/en\/web\/dou\/-\/portaria-n-652-de-25-de-janeiro-de-2021-300740786\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> <strong>decree issued by the federal government (no. 652, of January 25, 2021)<\/strong><\/a><\/span> places restrictions on migrants coming from Venezuela. The decree also imposes restrictions on people from the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland and South Africa, but in these cases due to the new strains of the coronavirus.\r\n\r\nAccording to a technical statement from the Coordination Office of Epidemiological Surveillance in Ports, Airports, Borders and Customs Facilities - COVIG, in response to the Official Letter from Conectas, \u201cthe restrictions referring to travelers from or who have spent time in the past fourteen days in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the Republic of South Africa, were recommended to CCSMI [Crisis Committee for the Supervision and Monitoring of the Impacts of Covid-19] by Anvisa, based on the precautionary principle, due to warnings issued by the WHO regarding the identification of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 in those countries. The restrictions on foreigners from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela are not contained in any of the documents presented by Anvisa to support the decision-making process of the aforementioned Committee.\u201d\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Oficio_1295531.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>Read the official letter sent by Anvisa here<\/strong><\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nThe agency also released a <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/SEI_ANVISA-1263508-Nota-Te%CC%81cnica-249-2020-GIMTV.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>technical report<\/strong><\/a><\/span> sent to the ministries with guidance on the entry of migrants into the country during the pandemic as determined by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.planalto.gov.br\/ccivil_03\/_ato2019-2022\/2020\/lei\/L13979compilado.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Law No. 13,979\/2020<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/span><\/a>\r\n\r\nIn addition to Anvisa, Conectas also submitted its letter to the ministries of Justice, Health and Infrastructure, the Office of the Chief of Staff and other government bodies responsible for the restriction.\r\n\r\nIn response to Conectas, the Ministry of Justice and Public Security stated that \u201cthere is no doubt that the inter-ministerial decree in question has legal backing. Furthermore, as the decree made very clear, the rule was preceded by a technical recommendation from Anvisa\u201d.\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Resposta-MJ-ao-estudo-CEPEDISA-e-fechamento-fronteira_23dez2020.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Read the official letter sent by Ministry of Justice here<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\u201cIt is serious that the Bolsonaro government has ignored the technical guidance of Anvisa and banned the entry of asylum seekers during the pandemic while since July it has allowed tourists into Brazil through airports,\u201d said Camila Asano, program director at Conectas. \u201cThis is clear discrimination based on nationality and socioeconomic status, which violates the spirit of the Migration Law\u201d.\r\n<h3>Restrictions on Venezuela and opening of the border with Paraguay<\/h3>\r\nSince the publication of the first decree in March 2020, the land border with Venezuela has been closed to migrants.\u00a0 At the time, the government justified the closure based on alleged guidance from Anvisa, which has now been denied by the agency. \u201cAs such, the technical reports issued by the Coordination Office of Epidemiological Surveillance in Ports, Airports, Borders and Customs Facilities (COVIG\/GGPAF\/Anvisa), contain no recommendations to segregate any border country,\u201d said the agency.\r\n\r\nSubsequent decrees included and excluded other countries, such as the unrestricted opening of the land border with Paraguay, but the restriction on people coming from Venezuela remained unchanged. Regarding the opening of the land border with Paraguay, Anvisa informed that in one of its technical reports it observed that \u201cthe Brazilian government\u2019s position on opening borders must be homogeneous for the whole country, considering that there are no restrictions on interstate travel\u201d.","post_title":"Bolsonaro government ignores guidance from regulator on border closures","post_excerpt":"In a statement sent to Conectas, the health sector regulatory agency Anvisa says it did not recommend segregation against Venezuelans on land borders; organizations call for an investigation","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"bolsonaro-government-ignores-guidance-from-regulator-on-border-closures","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2021-04-01 12:12:48","post_modified_gmt":"2021-04-01 12:12:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/noticias\/bolsonaro-government-ignores-guidance-from-regulator-on-border-closures\/","menu_order":1508,"post_type":"noticia","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},"noticia2":{"ID":28421,"post_author":"2","post_date":"2020-12-17 17:03:36","post_date_gmt":"2020-12-17 17:03:36","post_content":"After the closure of land borders; over nine months, against migrants and refugees, a technical opinion from CEPEDISA (Center for Research on Health Law) of the University of S\u00e3o Paulo (USP) pointed out that the federal government measures, in use, since March, is unjustifiable and does not have scientific basis. In addition, the report also states that ordinances issued by the federal government are selectively discriminatory.\r\n\r\nThe study, commissioned by Conectas, was sent this Wednesday (16th) to the ministries of Justice, Health and Infrastructure, as well as the Civil House and other agencies responsible for the restrictions.\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/PARECER_JURI%CC%81DICO_SANITA%CC%81RIO_FRONTEIRAS_CEPEDISA_FSP_USP.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>Read the full document here<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nAccording to the said opinion, preventing entry to ports, airports and land borders would only be justified at the initial phase of pandemic. This stage; which is classified as the containment phase, is of utmost importance in identifying people from transmission areas and spotting suspected and confirmed cases, which must be subjected to isolation for a period of 14 days.\r\n\r\nSuch restrictions aim to prevent sustained transmission in the country, that is; cases of contagion by the virus among the population, without the infected people who has traveled outside the national territory. It\u00b4s also noteworthy that <span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/portal.fiocruz.br\/noticia\/covid-19-relatorio-apresenta-estimativa-de-infeccao-pelo-virus-no-pais-e-os-impactos-no-sus\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>since March<\/strong><\/a><\/span>, Brazil has been in a situation of sustained transmission.\r\n\r\n\u201cFrom the moment we have sustained transmission of this deadly disease, especially when it spreads to all regions of a country; reaching every nooks and crannies of both small and not so small cities, sanitary measures to close ports, airports and land borders has lost much of their effectiveness and are no longer the best solution for curbing and controlling the epidemic\u201d, the document highlights.\r\n\r\nFurthermore, in this phase, the most suitable measure are pandemic mitigation actions, such as social distance, personal hygiene care and mass testing of confirmed case contacts for the tracking and identification of new cases.\r\n\r\n\u201cThe closure of Brazilian land borders is an excessive and extreme action devoid of adequate epidemiological control logic\u201d, the professor at USP's School of Public Health, Fernando Aith, responsible for the study emphasized. \"If non-Brazilians who comes in by air are subjected to certain conditions, the same treatment should be meted to anyone entering by land.\"\r\n\r\n<strong><em>Humanitarian restrictions<\/em><\/strong>\r\n\r\nAfter the unjustified <span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/noticias\/fechamento-de-fronteiras-com-punicoes-desproporcionais-pode-agravar-situacao-de-refugiados-alertam-especialistas\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>ban on the entry of people from Venezuela by land<\/strong><\/a><\/span> at the beginning of the year, <span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/noticias\/nova-regra-para-fronteiras-restringe-acesso-de-migrantes-em-busca-de-refugio\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>a new ordinance reopened the air borders<\/strong><\/a><\/span> for students and tourists in July.\u00a0 However, the rule excluded the possibility of entry of migrants with humanitarian visa.\r\n\r\n\"Families escaping from wars and conflicts, who manage to reach Brazil by land borders, are not eligible to apply for refuge and are thereby deported. \u00a0While tourists with purchasing power, i.e.; those who travel by plane are allowed to enter,\" says Camila Asano, program director at Conectas. \u201cThis discriminatory selection has influenced the government's decisions to reopen the borders. Economic aspects are being contemplated, but neither humanitarian nor sanitary is. That alone explains the authorization for tourists and the opening of the land border with Paraguay, on one hand, and the imposition of cruel penalties on refugees, on the other\u201d he adds.\r\n\r\n<em>\u00a0<\/em><em>See below the main human rights violating points of the current border closure ordinance, according to CEPEDISA-USP technical opinion:<\/em>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Violation of the principles of equality (Art. 5, caput) and the purpose of administrative acts (Art. 37 of the Constitution), must always be in the public interest;<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Discrimination against Venezuelans subsidiary clearly violates the principles of reasonableness and proportionality, which are basic to administrative law, which also outline the constitutional principles of motivation, purpose and transparency of Public Administration acts (Art. 37 of the Constitution);<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Violation of Article 32 of the International Health Regulations - IHR, which states that; States Parties have an obligation to minimize \u201cany inconvenience or anguish associated with restrictive measures\u201d and other appropriate assistance to travelers who are quarantined, isolated or subject to other procedures for public health purposes.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/Ofi%CC%81cio-Conectas-apresentac%CC%A7a%CC%83o-de-parecer-juri%CC%81dico-sanita%CC%81rio-sobre-fechamento-das-fronteiras.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>Click here for the letter sent by Conectas to the ministries<\/strong><\/a><\/span>","post_title":"Closing borders for refugees has no legal and health basis, says study","post_excerpt":"Technical opinion; commissioned by Conectas, was sent out to Ministries and other federal agencies responsible for the closure of land and water borders","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"closing-borders-for-refugees-has-no-legal-and-health-basis-says-study","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2021-04-01 12:32:33","post_modified_gmt":"2021-04-01 12:32:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/noticias\/closing-borders-for-refugees-has-no-legal-and-health-basis-says-study\/","menu_order":1422,"post_type":"noticia","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},"noticia3":{"ID":30524,"post_author":"26","post_date":"2021-03-18 20:06:30","post_date_gmt":"2021-03-18 20:06:30","post_content":"<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Despite the Judiciary having impeded the Brazilian government from deporting vulnerable migrants who arrive at the country\u00b4s borders, a new ordinance issued on Wednesday 26th, in an <\/span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.in.gov.br\/web\/dou\/-\/portaria-cc-pr-mjsp-minfra-ms-n-419-de-26-de-agosto-de-2020-274222561\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><b>extra issue of the Official Federal Gazette<\/b><\/a><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\">,<\/span> upholds entry restrictions for migrants arriving by land or water and suspends requests for asylum.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The new ordinance maintains the same text as the\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/noticias\/governo-reabre-fronteiras-para-turistas-e-mantem-restricao-a-entrada-de-solicitantes-de-refugio\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><b>previous ruling<\/b><\/a><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, with the addition of just two new rules on tourist travel insurance and the closure of air borders at some international airports. These measures tighten the rules on access by air which could prevent people coming from countries in conflict, who would have sought asylum in Brazil.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">At the beginning of the month of August,\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"https:\/\/oglobo.globo.com\/mundo\/barrados-por-portaria-imigrantes-se-abrigam-em-ponte-na-fronteira-entre-brasil-peru-enquanto-tentam-entrar-no-pais-24570622\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><b>asylum seekers were refused entry to Brazil<\/b><\/a><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, at the border between the state of Acre and Peru, based on interpretation of the ordinance. In response to a Public Civil Action made by several organisations, the Federal Justice of Acre established <\/span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/noticias\/justica-federal-barra-deportacao-de-migrantes-vulneraveis-na-pandemia\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><b>a ban on border closures<\/b><\/a><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0for migrants in vulnerable conditions. Those responsible for the Public Civil Action were Conectas Human Rights, C\u00e1ritas S\u00e3o Paulo, the Federal Prosecutor\u00b4s Office and the Public Defender\u00b4s Office of the Union.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cRepeated decisions by the Federal Justice Department have overturned the application of previous ordinances that restrict the access of vulnerable people seeking asylum in Brazil. But the government persists in going against the Migration Act, international commitments and the Judiciary itself, denying asylum to people fleeing from conflicts.\u201d Said Camila Asano, Programme Director at Conectas Human Rights.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Ordinance was signed by Ministers of the Civil House: Walter Braga Neto, of the Justice Department; Andr\u00e9 Mendon\u00e7a of the Ministry for Public Security; Tarc\u00edsio Gomes de Freitas of the Ministry for Infrastructure and Eduardo Pazuello who is the acting Health Minister.<\/span>","post_title":"Government goes against Judiciary and keeps borders closed to vulnerable migrants","post_excerpt":"An ordinance that upholds rules on closing land borders and deporting migrants, goes against judicial decisions that recognise illegalities in barring entry to asylum seekers","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"government-goes-against-judiciary-and-keeps-borders-closed-to-vulnerable-migrants-2","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2021-04-14 12:58:06","post_modified_gmt":"2021-04-14 12:58:06","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/?post_type=noticia&#038;p=30524","menu_order":1563,"post_type":"noticia","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}},"links_para_referencia":[{"titulo-referencia":"Consultation of the process in the Federal Court","arquivo_referencia":false,"link_externo":"https:\/\/www2.jfrs.jus.br\/consulta-processual\/?selForma=NU&txtValor=5031124-06.2020.4.04.7100&selOrigem=RS&g-recaptcha-response=03AGdBq24civdEJLSkXwkvGwuSl_XjRs5QX59RyVer5TJwJzp8UX_G8RHKCAN2zlRYr4cerPMk_8IAVCyqPcbAYi__766ls682DLHJAIccwhmqzZk1eGanqGW7DTXTtnWy7aH0Ec6aSMHi_JsFBfGqlEAHVOzZHIN_1GS06TaM2PiFyk7_WwKX0R-YKvHzKOJCm-9RthkIPEDngfzhQIx4K_MuZvfGZ4Oui3-gRqePDa75D4iDQ4JVR5OtlVarUmF2fvrzU2oe_qxRaGcQ5melTXBcez42IjDX3QW0UXvCjsqAHblMYPTNREREGI1WY8o9sdAjycbNvquQBVKdOKWxtjCjzkqVaaNMOzCvaw4ve70CLn16GTZADbllEYCrj_vTt955CnJGzBMvpJHrKIdNETYdvoWJ5zwWTYFCwdOr2LzkdhtXaRb-FIL2JZkKvbuLuSxH9PRfw2xI2J4E2AkiAs49tWmF9iKoXg&consulta-processual=1"},{"titulo-referencia":"Admission petition as amicus curiae","arquivo_referencia":{"ID":29624,"id":29624,"title":"31.05.20 - Peti\u2021\u05b6o de Ingresso - Amici Curiae - vf","filename":"31.05.20-Peti\u2021\u05b6o-de-Ingresso-Amici-Curiae-vf.pdf","filesize":690773,"url":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/31.05.20-Peti\u2021\u05b6o-de-Ingresso-Amici-Curiae-vf.pdf","link":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/litigiopt\/border-decrees-violation-of-the-right-to-migrate\/31-05-20-peti%e2%80%a1%d6%b6o-de-ingresso-amici-curiae-vf-2\/","alt":"","author":"26","description":"","caption":"","name":"31-05-20-peti%e2%80%a1%d6%b6o-de-ingresso-amici-curiae-vf-2","status":"inherit","uploaded_to":31546,"date":"2021-03-31 21:32:54","modified":"2021-05-12 12:36:24","menu_order":0,"mime_type":"application\/pdf","type":"application","subtype":"pdf","icon":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-includes\/images\/media\/document.png"},"link_externo":""}]},"yoast":{"focuskw":"Venezuela","title":"","metadesc":"Conectas, Caritas and Public Defender\u2019s Office denounce discriminatory policy against Venezuelans to federal court.","linkdex":"42","metakeywords":"","meta-robots-noindex":"","meta-robots-nofollow":"","meta-robots-adv":"","canonical":"","redirect":"","opengraph-title":"","opengraph-description":"","opengraph-image":"","twitter-title":"","twitter-description":"","twitter-image":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/litigiopt\/31546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/litigiopt"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/litigiopt"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29621"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"temaltigio","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/temaltigio?post=31546"},{"taxonomy":"categoria_litigio","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categoria_litigio?post=31546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}