{"id":31489,"date":"2020-08-17T21:08:58","date_gmt":"2020-08-17T21:08:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/?post_type=litigiopt&#038;p=31489"},"modified":"2021-05-20T14:37:31","modified_gmt":"2021-05-20T14:37:31","slug":"acre-discrimination-on-the-borders-during-the-pandemic","status":"publish","type":"litigiopt","link":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/litigiopt\/acre-discrimination-on-the-borders-during-the-pandemic\/","title":{"rendered":"Acre: Discrimination on the borders during the pandemic"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"tts_content_wrapper_1\" ><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-29612 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Migrantes-assis-brasil-Alexandre-Noronha_Amazo\u0302nia-Real-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" srcset=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Migrantes-assis-brasil-Alexandre-Noronha_Amazo\u0302nia-Real-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Migrantes-assis-brasil-Alexandre-Noronha_Amazo\u0302nia-Real-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Migrantes-assis-brasil-Alexandre-Noronha_Amazo\u0302nia-Real-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Migrantes-assis-brasil-Alexandre-Noronha_Amazo\u0302nia-Real-350x197.jpg 350w, https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Migrantes-assis-brasil-Alexandre-Noronha_Amazo\u0302nia-Real-1366x768.jpg 1366w, https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Migrantes-assis-brasil-Alexandre-Noronha_Amazo\u0302nia-Real-1920x1080.jpg 1920w, https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Migrantes-assis-brasil-Alexandre-Noronha_Amazo\u0302nia-Real.jpg 2000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The pandemic has worsened the vulnerability of migrants crossing borders into Brazil in search of safety, asylum and a new start in life. Drawing on the assertion that the entry of people from Venezuela could worsen the health crisis \u2013 something that was never confirmed in technical documents from Anvisa (National Health Regulatory Agency) \u2013 the federal government issued several decrees to condition the entry and asylum requests from Venezuelan citizens crossing land borders.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These border decrees, with identical content, were intended to regulate article 3, item VI, of Law 13,979\/2020, which defined the \u201cstate of public calamity\u201d in Brazil on account of the pandemic. In practice, <\/span><b>their enforcement led to the abandonment of dozens of people \u2013 including children, seniors and pregnant women \u2013 on the bridge that connects the border towns of Assis Brasil and I\u00f1apari, in Peru<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to Conectas, the Federal Prosecutor\u2019s Office, the Federal Public Defender\u2019s Office and Caritas Archdiocese of S\u00e3o Paulo, the decrees violate the Migration Law and the Refugee Law, international treaties such as the Geneva Convention (1951) and the Cartagena Declaration (1984), as well as the Brazilian Constitution.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">They also trample on the principle of non-refoulement, which prohibits the forced return of migrants to countries that subject them to inhumane or degrading treatment or to political persecution.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As a result of this situation, the organizations filed a Public Civil Action against the federal government demanding the <\/span><b>suspension of deportations and immigration regularization for people who arrive at the borders of the state of Acre<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The trial court judge accepted some of the requests and granted an injunction suspending the deportations and requiring the Brazilian State to guarantee the right to apply for asylum. The federal government appealed the ruling and managed to overturn the injunction, despite the internal motions filed by the petitioning organizations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although Venezuelans represent the largest migrant inflow to Brazil, which recognizes them as victims of serious and widespread human rights violations, only Haitians and Syrians can apply for temporary humanitarian visas in the country.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><b>Technical information<\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Case:\u00a0ACP 1004501-35.2020.4.01.3000<\/b><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Court:\u00a0<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">3rd Civil and Criminal Federal Court of the Judiciary Section of Acre (SJAC) \/ Federal Appeals Court of the 1st Region (TRF-1)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Status:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0Awaiting judgment of the merit by TRF-1 and judgment of the appeal filed by the federal government.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Procedure:<\/b>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">08\/17\/20: Initial petition<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">8\/19\/20: Trial court ruling accepts some requests and grants injunction<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">8\/20\/20: Federal government files appeal against granting of injunction<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">9\/3\/20: Ruling in favor of the appeal<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">9\/9\/20: Petitioners file internal motions against the acceptance of the appeal<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">10\/8\/20: Ruling deems the request for reconsideration impaired and accepts the request of the Public Prosecutor\u2019s Office to lift the secrecy of the Anvisa documents that were used to support the decrees<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><div class=\"tts__custom-position_bottom_fixed\" ><\/div>","protected":false},"featured_media":29612,"menu_order":0,"template":"","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"temaltigio":[12274],"categoria_litigio":[12976],"class_list":["post-31489","litigiopt","type-litigiopt","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","temaltigio-democracy-and-human-rights-movement","categoria_litigio-litigation"],"acf":{"subtitle-pt":"Case challenges federal government decrees permitting illegal deportation of Venezuelans in the town of Assis Brasil","noticias":{"noticia1":{"ID":28421,"post_author":"2","post_date":"2020-12-17 17:03:36","post_date_gmt":"2020-12-17 17:03:36","post_content":"After the closure of land borders; over nine months, against migrants and refugees, a technical opinion from CEPEDISA (Center for Research on Health Law) of the University of S\u00e3o Paulo (USP) pointed out that the federal government measures, in use, since March, is unjustifiable and does not have scientific basis. In addition, the report also states that ordinances issued by the federal government are selectively discriminatory.\r\n\r\nThe study, commissioned by Conectas, was sent this Wednesday (16th) to the ministries of Justice, Health and Infrastructure, as well as the Civil House and other agencies responsible for the restrictions.\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/PARECER_JURI%CC%81DICO_SANITA%CC%81RIO_FRONTEIRAS_CEPEDISA_FSP_USP.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>Read the full document here<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nAccording to the said opinion, preventing entry to ports, airports and land borders would only be justified at the initial phase of pandemic. This stage; which is classified as the containment phase, is of utmost importance in identifying people from transmission areas and spotting suspected and confirmed cases, which must be subjected to isolation for a period of 14 days.\r\n\r\nSuch restrictions aim to prevent sustained transmission in the country, that is; cases of contagion by the virus among the population, without the infected people who has traveled outside the national territory. It\u00b4s also noteworthy that <span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/portal.fiocruz.br\/noticia\/covid-19-relatorio-apresenta-estimativa-de-infeccao-pelo-virus-no-pais-e-os-impactos-no-sus\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>since March<\/strong><\/a><\/span>, Brazil has been in a situation of sustained transmission.\r\n\r\n\u201cFrom the moment we have sustained transmission of this deadly disease, especially when it spreads to all regions of a country; reaching every nooks and crannies of both small and not so small cities, sanitary measures to close ports, airports and land borders has lost much of their effectiveness and are no longer the best solution for curbing and controlling the epidemic\u201d, the document highlights.\r\n\r\nFurthermore, in this phase, the most suitable measure are pandemic mitigation actions, such as social distance, personal hygiene care and mass testing of confirmed case contacts for the tracking and identification of new cases.\r\n\r\n\u201cThe closure of Brazilian land borders is an excessive and extreme action devoid of adequate epidemiological control logic\u201d, the professor at USP's School of Public Health, Fernando Aith, responsible for the study emphasized. \"If non-Brazilians who comes in by air are subjected to certain conditions, the same treatment should be meted to anyone entering by land.\"\r\n\r\n<strong><em>Humanitarian restrictions<\/em><\/strong>\r\n\r\nAfter the unjustified <span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/noticias\/fechamento-de-fronteiras-com-punicoes-desproporcionais-pode-agravar-situacao-de-refugiados-alertam-especialistas\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>ban on the entry of people from Venezuela by land<\/strong><\/a><\/span> at the beginning of the year, <span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/noticias\/nova-regra-para-fronteiras-restringe-acesso-de-migrantes-em-busca-de-refugio\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>a new ordinance reopened the air borders<\/strong><\/a><\/span> for students and tourists in July.\u00a0 However, the rule excluded the possibility of entry of migrants with humanitarian visa.\r\n\r\n\"Families escaping from wars and conflicts, who manage to reach Brazil by land borders, are not eligible to apply for refuge and are thereby deported. \u00a0While tourists with purchasing power, i.e.; those who travel by plane are allowed to enter,\" says Camila Asano, program director at Conectas. \u201cThis discriminatory selection has influenced the government's decisions to reopen the borders. Economic aspects are being contemplated, but neither humanitarian nor sanitary is. That alone explains the authorization for tourists and the opening of the land border with Paraguay, on one hand, and the imposition of cruel penalties on refugees, on the other\u201d he adds.\r\n\r\n<em>\u00a0<\/em><em>See below the main human rights violating points of the current border closure ordinance, according to CEPEDISA-USP technical opinion:<\/em>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Violation of the principles of equality (Art. 5, caput) and the purpose of administrative acts (Art. 37 of the Constitution), must always be in the public interest;<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Discrimination against Venezuelans subsidiary clearly violates the principles of reasonableness and proportionality, which are basic to administrative law, which also outline the constitutional principles of motivation, purpose and transparency of Public Administration acts (Art. 37 of the Constitution);<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Violation of Article 32 of the International Health Regulations - IHR, which states that; States Parties have an obligation to minimize \u201cany inconvenience or anguish associated with restrictive measures\u201d and other appropriate assistance to travelers who are quarantined, isolated or subject to other procedures for public health purposes.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/Ofi%CC%81cio-Conectas-apresentac%CC%A7a%CC%83o-de-parecer-juri%CC%81dico-sanita%CC%81rio-sobre-fechamento-das-fronteiras.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>Click here for the letter sent by Conectas to the ministries<\/strong><\/a><\/span>","post_title":"Closing borders for refugees has no legal and health basis, says study","post_excerpt":"Technical opinion; commissioned by Conectas, was sent out to Ministries and other federal agencies responsible for the closure of land and water borders","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"closing-borders-for-refugees-has-no-legal-and-health-basis-says-study","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2021-04-01 12:32:33","post_modified_gmt":"2021-04-01 12:32:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/noticias\/closing-borders-for-refugees-has-no-legal-and-health-basis-says-study\/","menu_order":1422,"post_type":"noticia","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},"noticia2":{"ID":30508,"post_author":"26","post_date":"2021-03-24 09:04:22","post_date_gmt":"2021-03-24 09:04:22","post_content":"\u201cIt is alarming that the police have acted disproportionately, by entering the shelters without a warrant and coercively taking the people in charge of these places to the police station,\u201d said 136 civil society organizations in a joint letter addressed to the authorities of the state of Roraima and the federal government this Tuesday, March 23. The statement was published in response to a <a href=\"https:\/\/www1.folha.uol.com.br\/mundo\/2021\/03\/policia-invade-abrigo-de-refugiados-e-detem-freira-em-roraima.shtml\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>police action in Pacaraima<\/strong><\/a> (state of Roraima), on the border with Venezuela, after an alleged complaint of a gathering received by the municipality\u2019s health surveillance team.\r\n\r\n\u201cTo properly understand the situation, we must bear in mind that the staff at the shelters did not bring the people to the country, but acted humanely to help human beings in a situation of high vulnerability and evident need for accommodation and support. Accommodating and helping people fleeing hunger, misery and serious rights violations is an act of humanity,\u201d said the organizations.\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/NOTA-PU\u0301BLICA-POR-JUSTIC\u0327A-E-DIGNIDADE-CONTRA-A-VIOLE\u0302NCIA-1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>Read the statement in full here<\/strong><\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nThe document was sent to the Public Security Department of Roraima, the State Public Prosecutor\u2019s Office, the State Public Defender\u2019s Office, the Federal Police and the National Security Force. It was signed by organizations such as Caritas Brazil, Miss\u00e3o Paz, Avina Foundation, CIMI (Indigenous Missionary Council), Commission on the Rights of Immigrants and Refugees of OAB-SP (S\u00e3o Paulo State Bar Association) and Conectas Human Rights.\r\n\r\nThe operation displaced more than 70 people, including migrant women \u00ad\u2013 some of them pregnant \u2013 and children from the Casa S\u00e3o Jos\u00e9 shelter run by the religious organizations Sisters of Saint Joseph and Migrant Pastoral Service of the Diocese of Roraima and also the Living Waters Assemblies of God Church. Representatives of Caritas Brazil and the Federal Public Defender\u2019s Office had to intervene to make sure there were no summary deportations and so the families could be received by the <em>Opera\u00e7\u00e3o Acolhida<\/em> (Operation Welcome) migrant program run by the federal government.","post_title":"Government uses pandemic to violate refugee rights, claim more than 130 organizations","post_excerpt":"In a statement, they condemn the police operation at a migrant shelter in Pacaraima that resulted in a nun and pastor working with the families being taken to the police station","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"government-uses-pandemic-to-violate-refugee-rights-claim-more-than-130-organizations","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2021-04-14 12:27:33","post_modified_gmt":"2021-04-14 12:27:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/?post_type=noticia&#038;p=30508","menu_order":1311,"post_type":"noticia","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},"noticia3":{"ID":28075,"post_author":"2","post_date":"2021-02-26 20:46:07","post_date_gmt":"2021-02-26 20:46:07","post_content":"On Thursday, February 25, Conectas and Miss\u00e3o Paz filed a representation petition with the Federal Prosecutor\u2019s Office requesting an investigation into the discriminatory closure of land borders for refugees coming from Venezuela.\r\n\r\nDocuments produced by Anvisa (National Health Regulatory Agency) reveal that there was no guidance from the regulator to put segregated bans on the entry of people to Brazil from border countries during the restrictions imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic.\r\n\r\nThe documents were sent to Conectas in response to a<a href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/PARECER_JURI%CC%81DICO_SANITA%CC%81RIO_FRONTEIRAS_CEPEDISA_FSP_USP.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> <strong>technical opinion<\/strong><\/span><\/a> produced by Cepedisa\u00a0(Center for Research on Health Law of the University of S\u00e3o Paulo) and addressed to the agency in December last year. The study demonstrated that the restrictions imposed by the federal government through decrees published over the course of 2020 <a href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/noticias\/fechamento-de-fronteiras-para-refugiados-nao-possui-base-juridica-e-sanitaria-aponta-centro-de-pesquisa-da-usp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>are not based on legal or health grounds<\/strong>.<\/span><\/a>\r\n\r\nIn response to the technical opinion, the agency declared that \u201cthere are no recommendations to segregate any border country\u201d. However, the current<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.in.gov.br\/en\/web\/dou\/-\/portaria-n-652-de-25-de-janeiro-de-2021-300740786\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> <strong>decree issued by the federal government (no. 652, of January 25, 2021)<\/strong><\/a><\/span> places restrictions on migrants coming from Venezuela. The decree also imposes restrictions on people from the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland and South Africa, but in these cases due to the new strains of the coronavirus.\r\n\r\nAccording to a technical statement from the Coordination Office of Epidemiological Surveillance in Ports, Airports, Borders and Customs Facilities - COVIG, in response to the Official Letter from Conectas, \u201cthe restrictions referring to travelers from or who have spent time in the past fourteen days in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the Republic of South Africa, were recommended to CCSMI [Crisis Committee for the Supervision and Monitoring of the Impacts of Covid-19] by Anvisa, based on the precautionary principle, due to warnings issued by the WHO regarding the identification of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 in those countries. The restrictions on foreigners from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela are not contained in any of the documents presented by Anvisa to support the decision-making process of the aforementioned Committee.\u201d\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Oficio_1295531.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>Read the official letter sent by Anvisa here<\/strong><\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nThe agency also released a <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/SEI_ANVISA-1263508-Nota-Te%CC%81cnica-249-2020-GIMTV.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>technical report<\/strong><\/a><\/span> sent to the ministries with guidance on the entry of migrants into the country during the pandemic as determined by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.planalto.gov.br\/ccivil_03\/_ato2019-2022\/2020\/lei\/L13979compilado.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Law No. 13,979\/2020<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/span><\/a>\r\n\r\nIn addition to Anvisa, Conectas also submitted its letter to the ministries of Justice, Health and Infrastructure, the Office of the Chief of Staff and other government bodies responsible for the restriction.\r\n\r\nIn response to Conectas, the Ministry of Justice and Public Security stated that \u201cthere is no doubt that the inter-ministerial decree in question has legal backing. Furthermore, as the decree made very clear, the rule was preceded by a technical recommendation from Anvisa\u201d.\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Resposta-MJ-ao-estudo-CEPEDISA-e-fechamento-fronteira_23dez2020.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Read the official letter sent by Ministry of Justice here<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\u201cIt is serious that the Bolsonaro government has ignored the technical guidance of Anvisa and banned the entry of asylum seekers during the pandemic while since July it has allowed tourists into Brazil through airports,\u201d said Camila Asano, program director at Conectas. \u201cThis is clear discrimination based on nationality and socioeconomic status, which violates the spirit of the Migration Law\u201d.\r\n<h3>Restrictions on Venezuela and opening of the border with Paraguay<\/h3>\r\nSince the publication of the first decree in March 2020, the land border with Venezuela has been closed to migrants.\u00a0 At the time, the government justified the closure based on alleged guidance from Anvisa, which has now been denied by the agency. \u201cAs such, the technical reports issued by the Coordination Office of Epidemiological Surveillance in Ports, Airports, Borders and Customs Facilities (COVIG\/GGPAF\/Anvisa), contain no recommendations to segregate any border country,\u201d said the agency.\r\n\r\nSubsequent decrees included and excluded other countries, such as the unrestricted opening of the land border with Paraguay, but the restriction on people coming from Venezuela remained unchanged. Regarding the opening of the land border with Paraguay, Anvisa informed that in one of its technical reports it observed that \u201cthe Brazilian government\u2019s position on opening borders must be homogeneous for the whole country, considering that there are no restrictions on interstate travel\u201d.","post_title":"Bolsonaro government ignores guidance from regulator on border closures","post_excerpt":"In a statement sent to Conectas, the health sector regulatory agency Anvisa says it did not recommend segregation against Venezuelans on land borders; organizations call for an investigation","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"bolsonaro-government-ignores-guidance-from-regulator-on-border-closures","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2021-04-01 12:12:48","post_modified_gmt":"2021-04-01 12:12:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/noticias\/bolsonaro-government-ignores-guidance-from-regulator-on-border-closures\/","menu_order":1508,"post_type":"noticia","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}},"links_para_referencia":[{"titulo-referencia":"Inicial petition","arquivo_referencia":{"ID":29615,"id":29615,"title":"Inicial 1004501-35.2020.4.01.3000","filename":"Inicial-1004501-35.2020.4.01.3000.pdf","filesize":11938731,"url":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Inicial-1004501-35.2020.4.01.3000.pdf","link":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/litigiopt\/acre-discrimination-on-the-borders-during-the-pandemic\/inicial-1004501-35-2020-4-01-3000-2\/","alt":"","author":"26","description":"","caption":"","name":"inicial-1004501-35-2020-4-01-3000-2","status":"inherit","uploaded_to":31489,"date":"2021-03-31 21:07:12","modified":"2021-05-10 14:30:24","menu_order":0,"mime_type":"application\/pdf","type":"application","subtype":"pdf","icon":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/wp-includes\/images\/media\/document.png"},"link_externo":""}]},"yoast":{"focuskw":"","title":"","metadesc":"","linkdex":"","metakeywords":"","meta-robots-noindex":"","meta-robots-nofollow":"","meta-robots-adv":"","canonical":"","redirect":"","opengraph-title":"","opengraph-description":"","opengraph-image":"","twitter-title":"","twitter-description":"","twitter-image":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/litigiopt\/31489","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/litigiopt"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/litigiopt"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29612"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31489"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"temaltigio","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/temaltigio?post=31489"},{"taxonomy":"categoria_litigio","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conectas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categoria_litigio?post=31489"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}